Site icon businessstandardsng.com

Why  The Going  Away of P&G Is Not Surprising 

 

We all saw it coming, what with Dunlop and Michelin pulling out. Operational costs, forex issues caused these two big tyre manufacturers to move out of our shores.

The Federal Government in 2006, reduced the tariff on imported tyres from 40 percent to 10 percent. This coupled with poor power supply led to Dunlop shutting down operations in 2008. And to pay off N8 billion in loans, the firm in 2012, decided to sell several assets which was eventually completed in 2014.

According to the Coordinator of Standard Organisation of Nigeria in Kwara at a point, Sunday Yashim,  the influx of  ‘tokunbo’ tyres (fairly used tyres) forced the  Dunlop and Michelin tyre manufacturers in Nigeria to relocate to Ghana. Unfavorable business environment, that was it.

US multinational consumer goods company, Procter & Gamble, announced plans to terminate its on-ground operations in Nigeria, transforming the country into an import-focused market.

The Chief Financial Officer, Andre Schulten, spoke at the Morgan Stanley Global Consumer & Retail Conference in New York, citing challenges operating as a dollar-denominated organisation in Nigeria’s complex macroeconomic environment.

Despite being a $50m net sales business in Nigeria, P&G, with an $85bn overall portfolio, said that it expected minimal impact on the group’s balance sheet in terms of sales or profitability.

For Schulten, “The other reality that arises in some of these markets is that it gets increasingly difficult to operate and create US dollar value. So when you think about places like Nigeria and Argentina, it is difficult for us to operate because of the macroeconomic environment.

“So with that in mind, we are announcing a restructuring programme with the intent to adjust the operating model and adjust the portfolio to ensure that we maintain the portfolio discipline that has brought us to this point.

“The restructuring programme will largely focus on Nigeria and Argentina. We’ve announced that we will turn Nigeria into an import-only market, effectively dissolving our footprint on the ground in Nigeria and reverting to an import-only model.”

This is an age-old issue which remains our adversary. Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) has never stopped crying against it. It has become a sing song for this manufacturers’ advocacy group and other groups like Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry(LCCI), andNigeri.an Association of Chambers Commerce Industry and Agriculture (NACCIMA).

Only recently, MAN came up with the following recommendation which it believes will make the manufacturing sector blossom:

o   Stakeholder Dialogue: The government should engage in constructive dialogue with the stakeholders in the private sector to share their concerns, provide feedback on the potential impacts of the policy changes, and collaborate on finding solutions to mitigate adverse effects on businesses.

 o   Policy Clarity and Predictability: The government should provide clear and consistent policies to provide certainty for businesses. Frequent policy changes and uncertainties could hinder long-term investments and growth.

 o   Economic Impact Assessment: The government should conduct a comprehensive economic impact assessment of the fuel subsidy removal, exchange rate changes, and other policy measures. This assessment should identify potential challenges and opportunities for the private sector and inform further adjustments to the policies if necessary.

 o   Access to Credit: To ensure the effective implementation of the plans to support the manufacturing sector and MSMEs, the government should provide streamlined processes for accessing credit and preferential terms that are suitable for different types of businesses.

 o   Infrastructure Development: The government undivided attention and priority be paid to infrastructure development projects to enhance transportation, logistics, and energy supply. These improvements will positively impact on businesses’ efficiency and reduce operational costs.

o   Support for Workers: While supporting the introduction of a new national minimum wage, we emphasize the need for a balanced approach to ensure businesses can manage labor costs without compromising employment stability.

 o   Transparent and Efficient Implementation: We recommend transparency and efficiency in the disbursement of funds and implementation of support programmes. This will ensure that the resources reach intended beneficiaries promptly.

 o   Continuous Monitoring and Feedback Mechanism: Government should establish a monitoring and feedback mechanism to assess the effectiveness of the implemented policies and make necessary adjustments based on real-time feedback from businesses.

 o   Regulatory Reforms: We recommend regulatory reforms to improve the ease of doing business in Nigeria. Simplified and efficient regulations would attract more investments and foster a conducive business environment.

 o   Social Safety Nets: To mitigate the short-term impact of the policy changes on vulnerable groups, the private sector advocates for the government to implement social safety nets or targeted support programs to protect those most affected.

 o   Long-Term Economic Vision: The government should articulate a clear long-term economic vision that outlines the pathway to sustainable economic growth, job creation, and poverty reduction. By providing these recommendations, we aim to work collaboratively with the government to ensure that the economic reforms are balanced, sustainable, and beneficial for all stakeholders.

 Other Specific Recommendations

 

Why haven’t we been able to stem this problem with these myriad of observations and recommendations?

Enterprise Issues

With Siaka Momoh

Exit mobile version