Site icon businessstandardsng.com

Burden for Tinubu’s Administration, Burden for MAN…

 

‘Contrary to the popular parlance in the government quarters that Nigeria has revenue problem, the country’s debt crisis is not a result of inadequate revenue and it is anti-growth to view manufacturing taxes as the last resort for curbing the debt problem.

 

In the absence of commensurate infrastructural development and significant success in poverty-reduction and industrialization programmes, Nigeria’s bloated debt profile has become a source of worry, says Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) in its  CEO’s Confidence Index (Special Focus) for First Quarter 2023.

According to the report, “Contrary to the popular parlance in the government quarters that Nigeria has revenue problem, the country’s debt crisis is not a result of inadequate revenue and it is anti-growth to view manufacturing taxes as the last resort for curbing the debt problem. The manufacturing sector which has always been at the receiving end has not felt any significant impact of the debt finance on the numerous challenges that have bedeviled its performance in many years. Infrastructure decadence, forex scarcity, credit crunch and naira depreciation have become bones in the throats of MAN members despite the humongous increase of over 410% in the country’s debt profile in the last eight years.”

It adds that amidst multiple taxes, Nigeria’s real problem is not revenue generation or collection but the siphonage of collected revenue so that they do not reflect in the records.

It argues, “Contrary to popular believe, exorbitant taxes are also collected in the informal sector of the economy without adequate remittance into state coffers. MAN is of the view that debt worth of N77 trillion is an enormous burden to inherit and will most likely limit the achievements of the new administration unless the

following recommendations are implemented:

According to the report, “As of December 2022, the country’s total debt had escalated to N46.25 trillion, marking about 17 percent surge from the record of December 2021. The debt composition revealed that while domestic debt stock accounted for 59.6% of the total debt, external debt stock contributed 40.4%. Unfortunately, the country’s debt profile has ballooned to over N77 trillion following the approval of the securitization of the Ways and Means advances. A whooping debt service-to-revenue ratio of over 100 percent may spell doom for the new administration leaving it to continue the borrowing spree or incapacitated to provide critical infrastructure needed to boost the manufacturing sector and kick start the recovery of the economy.

“The domino effects of escalating public debt on the manufacturing sector are endless. To start with, rising domestic debt is highly crowding out private investment in the manufacturing sector by reducing credit availability and forcing hike in lending rates. External debts are mostly serviced in foreign currencies, hence high demand for foreign currencies further depreciates the naira and makes importation of non-locally produced critical inputs highly expensive for manufacturers.”

It states further, “Moreover, higher debt servicing is consuming greater volume of forex and worsening the forex scarcity that has plagued the manufacturing sector for many years. Higher debt repayment requires increased revenue. The Nigerian government has continued to breed a harsh business environment by its indiscriminate imposition of high and multiple taxes on manufacturers all in a bid to generate revenue. A major point of reference is the recent exponential hike of the excise duties on beverage and tobacco goods.

“Huge public debt led to low foreign investment and foreign capital inflow which worsen the forex scarcity that has remained a bone in the throat of manufactures. As public debt continues to grow unsustainably, it becomes increasingly difficult to cover salary payments and other recurrent expenditure in the civil service. The implication is more borrowing for government consumption or recurrent expenditure and less on infrastructure and other capital projects meant to boost manufacturing sector performance.”

 Siaka Momoh :Sector; www.realsectornow.com;

Exit mobile version